A Gender-Based and Quasi-Experimental Study of the Catastrophic and Impoverishing Health-Care Expenditures in Mexican Households with Elderly Members, 2000-2020.

Latin America has experienced a rise in noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) which is having repercussions on the structuring of healthcare delivery and social protection for vulnerable populations. We examined catastrophic (CHE) and excessive (EHE, impoverishing and/or catastrophic) health care expenditures in Mexican households with and without elderly members (≥65 years), by gender of head of the households, during 2000-2020. We analyzed pooled cross-sectional data for 380,509 households from eleven rounds of the National Household Income and Expenditure Survey. Male- and female-headed households (MHHs and FHHs) were matched using propensity scores to control for gender bias in systematic differences regarding care-seeking (demand for healthcare) preferences. Adjusted probabilities of positive health expenditures, CHE and EHE were estimated using probit and two-stage probit models, respectively. Quintiles of EHE by state among FHHs with elderly members were also mapped. CHE and EHE were greater among FHHs than among MHHs (4.7% vs 3.9% and 5.5% vs 4.6%), and greater in FHHs with elderly members (5.8% vs 4.9% and 6.9% vs 5.8%). EHE in FHHs with elderly members varied geographically from 3.9% to 9.1%, being greater in less developed eastern, north-central and southeastern states. Compared with MHHs, FHHs face greater risks of CHE and EHE. This vulnerability is exacerbated in FHHs with elderly members, because of gender intersectional vulnerability. The present context, marked by a growing burden of NCDs and inequities amplified by COVID-19, makes key interlinkages across multiple Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) apparent, and calls for urgent measures that strengthen social protection in health.

Extension Professionals' Perceived Needs and Programmatic Responses During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Faculty and associates who support faculty-directed Extension work possess a depth of knowledge in one content area, directly support the programmatic needs of agents, and serve as a critical resource for professional development (i.e., in-service training) and technical assistance within their area of expertise. Assessments in response to public health issues often include a survey to gauge understanding and concern about a poten1tial hazard (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2015). Agents perceived additional needs and topics of interest related to home gardening, mental health, personal/family resource management, farm/small business information, youth education, trauma-informed parenting practices, healthy recipes and cooking demonstrations, and internet access. Extension professionals also have provided print and online resources on financial resource management, mental health, healthy homes, child development, family life, nutrition, and food safety, and other topics.

The impact of COVID-19 on essential health service provision for endemic infectious diseases in the South-East Asia region: A systematic review.

Background: There is increasing evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted adversely on the provision of essential health services. The South East Asia region (SEAR) has experienced extremely high rates of COVID-19 infection, and continues to bear a significant proportion of communicable disease burden worldwide. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review of quantitative evidence to estimate the impact of COVID-19 on the provision of essential prevention, detection, treatment, and management services for five high-burden infectious diseases across the SEAR. Findings: A total of 2338 studies were reviewed, and 12 studies were included in our analysis, covering six countries across the SEAR (Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Myanmar, Thailand, and India) for three conditions of interest (HIV, TB, dengue fever). We identified significant disruption to TB testing (range=25% to 77.9%) and diagnoses (range=50% to 58%) in India, Nepal, and Indonesia; and similar disruptions were observed for screening, new diagnoses and commencing HIV treatment in India and Thailand. There was also drastically reduced case detection for dengue fever (range=75% to 90% disrupted) in Bhutan and Sri Lanka. No studies were identified for malaria nor hepatitis in any country, and nor for any service in the remaining six SEAR countries. Interpretation: We identified evidence of significant disruption to the prevention, diagnoses, treatment, and management of TB, HIV, and dengue fever due to the COVID-19 pandemic across multiple SEAR country settings. This has the potential to set back hard-fought gains in infectious disease control across the region. The lack of evidence for the impact of the pandemic on malaria and hepatitis services, and in the remaining six SEAR countries, is an important evidence gap that should be addressed in order to inform future policy for service protection and pandemic preparedness. Funding: This work was supported by the WHO Sri Lanka Country office.

The impact of COVID-19 on essential health service provision for noncommunicable diseases in the South-East Asia region: A systematic review.

Background: COVID-19 has had a profound impact on the health systems of the 11 countries of the WHO South East Asia Region. We conducted a systematic review of studies that used quantitative and comparative approaches to assess the impact of the pandemic on the service provision of four noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) (cancer, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory diseases, and diabetes) in the region. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, MedRxiv, and WHO COVID-19 databases in December 2021. The quality of studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist and the ROBINS-I risk of bias tool. A narrative synthesis was conducted following the 'synthesis without meta-analysis' reporting guidelines. Findings: Two review authors independently screened 5,397 records with 31 studies included, 26 which were cross-sectional studies. Most studies (n=24, 77%) were conducted in India and 19 (61%) were single-site studies. Compared to a pre-pandemic period, 10/17 cancer studies found a >40% reduction in outpatient services, 9/14 cardiovascular disease found a reduction of 30% or greater in inpatient admissions and 2 studies found diagnoses and interventions for respiratory diseases reduced up to 78.9% and 83.0%, respectively. No eligible studies on the impact of COVID-19 on diabetes services were found. Interpretation: COVID-19 has substantially disrupted the provision of essential health services for NCDs in the WHO South East Asia Region, particularly cancer and cardiovascular disease. This is likely to have serious and potentially long-term downstream impacts on health and mortality of those living with or at risk of NCDs in the region. Funding: This work was supported by the WHO Sri Lanka Country Office.

A Systematic Review of the Costs Relating to Non-pharmaceutical Interventions Against Infectious Disease Outbreaks.

BACKGROUND: Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are the cornerstone of infectious disease outbreak response in the absence of effective pharmaceutical interventions. Outbreak strategies often involve combinations of NPIs that may change according to disease prevalence and population response. Little is known with regard to how costly each NPI is to implement. This information is essential to inform policy decisions for outbreak response. OBJECTIVE: To address this gap in existing literature, we conducted a systematic review on outbreak costings and simulation studies related to a number of NPI strategies, including isolating infected individuals, contact tracing and quarantine, and school closures. METHODS: Our search covered the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, studies published between 1990 and 24 March 2020 were included. We included studies containing cost data for our NPIs of interest in pandemic, epidemic, and outbreak response scenarios. RESULTS: We identified 61 relevant studies. There was substantial heterogeneity in the cost components recorded for NPIs in outbreak costing studies. The direct costs of NPIs for which costing studies existed also ranged widely: isolating infected individuals per case: US$141.18 to US$1042.68 (2020 values), tracing and quarantine of contacts per contact: US$40.73 to US$93.59, social distancing: US$33.76 to US$167.92, personal protection and hygiene: US$0.15 to US$895.60. CONCLUSION: While there are gaps and heterogeneity in available cost data, the findings of this review and the collated cost database serve as an important resource for evidence-based decision-making for estimating costs pertaining to NPI implementation in future outbreak response policies.